Review and Acceptance Process

Official Review Process

SICET employs a structured, multi-stage review process to ensure the highest quality of published academic research. Authors can track the progress of their submission directly from their dashboard.

Workflow Stages

Abstract Submitted

The author completes the initial abstract upload. A unique submission code is generated.

Processing

The administrative committee reviews the abstract PDF, checking the topic, clarity, and basic suitability for the conference.

Waiting for Paper Submission

The abstract is verified. The full paper upload functionality is enabled, and authors can enter up to three author profiles.

Waiting for Approval

The full paper has been uploaded and payment is successfully verified. The administrative committee conducts the final review of the submitted paper.

Completed

The admin approves and finalizes the paper. The final paper is shared via email and made available for download in the user dashboard.

Alternative Outcomes

Declined

If a submission does not meet conference standards, it will be declined.

Admin must provide a decline reason.
The exact reason is displayed in the user dashboard.

Revision Required

The paper has potential but requires adjustments before final approval.

Admin comments are displayed in the dashboard.
Revised file upload functionality is enabled.
Previous file versions are preserved.